Lynchburg Derailment Raises Richmond Concerns

A train derailment yesterday in Lynchburg train destroyed three oil tanker cars and spilled an estimated 50,000 gallons of crude oil into the James River.

Thankfully no one was hurt in the upriver incident, but it has raised local concerns. The Times Dispatch reports:

The spill also prompted Richmond utility officials to prepare to possibly switch to an alternative source for the city’s drinking water supply, which depends primarily on the James. With the river at flood stage, that isn’t likely, said city officials, who plan to use booms to capture any oil nearing the treatment plant.
The incident also cast a bright light on the rapidly expanding rail transport of crude oil from the Upper Plains through Virginia — and downtown Richmond — to terminals and refineries in the Northeast, raising safety and environmental concerns all along the way.
“It’s difficult to get Virginia to pay attention to this because they don’t think of their being part of the oil patch, but now they are,” said Fred Millar, an Arlington County-based consultant on hazardous materials safety who has warned Virginia officials of potential dangers from the transport of crude oil across the state.

Personally, while I am not panicking, I do know of a few neighbors who have filled water containers despite safety assurances. This may cause more scrutiny of trains going by the neighborhood along the Kanawha Canal.

Traffic Impact Briefing for Collegiate Races May 2-4

From Councilperson Parker Agelasto:

Dear all,

I am passing along information about the 2014 USA Cycling Collegiate Road National Championship occurring May 2 – 4. There will be road closings affecting the northeastern portion of the 5th District. Please note that the provisions that have been recommended to accommodate for ingress and egress from neighborhoods. Oregon Hill will be most affected and will gain access by the temporary conversion of 2nd Street to two-way.

Please feel free to distribute this information to your civic association members as I am certain they will want to know.

Many thanks,
Parker C. Agelasto
Richmond City Council, 5th District

Click here for full Power Point file- 4.8.14 Traffic Impact Presser_v2

Screen Shot 2014-04-11 at 12.22.41 AM copy

“RVA and Rapid Transit: Where Are We? Where Do We Need to Be?”

From Richmond.com:

With an international bicycle race coming to town next year(!), Richmond needs to seriously get to work a bus rapid transit system to make sure all the spectators can get from point A to point B quickly and safely – and hopefully do a lot of dining and shopping while they’re here. – D.W.

GRTC held a public meeting in August 2013 to present a plan for Bus Rapid Transit in the Broad Street corridor. “GRTC and its partners in the plan, including the Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation, presented the plan for the rapid transit between Rocketts Landing and Willow Lawn and talked about economic and environmental impact studies of the service,” according to a report in the Richmond Times-Dispatch.
If BRT ever happened, clearly it won’t be ready in time for the UCI World Cycling Championships in September 2015. I do know that Richmond 2015 is working with regional planners on shuttle services and transportation to move the fans around during the two-week cycling event, but that is not part of the BRT proposal.
“The plan calls for creating a 7.6-mile dedicated bus route from Rocketts Landing to Willow Lawn, mostly along Broad Street. For most of the route, the service would operate in a newly created bus-only lane in the middle of Broad Street. It would offer service as frequently as once every five minutes and use on-board technology to control traffic signals at intersections, allowing it to proceed with a minimum number of stops. The service would be in addition to regular local route service,” according to the Times-Dispatch report.
“If constructed as proposed, the new service would decrease travel time for riders by up to 65 percent and increase ridership by more than a third, to about 5,000 passengers a day. It would have 14 stops. The project would cost about $68 million in capital improvements and require about $4 million in annual operating costs. About half the capital costs could be covered by federal grants, with the state and local governments making up the other half.”

Meanwhile, this Thursday, at U of R downtown…

Thursday, February 20, 12:30-1 p.m.
RVA and Rapid Transit: Where Are We? Where Do We Need to Be?
Andrew Terry, Assistant Pastor at Richmond Hill

TAKE 30 is a 30-minute lunchtime series, led by University of Richmond professors and community leaders, to consider questions in the arts, humanities, sciences, business, and law. Each TAKE 30 is free and open to the public.

The Possibility Of Parking Permits

Special thanks to Mr. Bergin for answering questions about parking decal regulations at last night’s Oregon Hill Neighborhood Association meeting.

He sent this message this morning:

Hello all,

Attached as a PDF is the city code, Criteria for establishment of a
residential restricted parking district. I want to make a few points on
what we discussed:

1. You should have a minimum of 10 contiguous block faces, and as I
stated legal explained to me that if not contiguous, the separation of
blocks should be reasonable. Also, remember it is not blocks but block
faces.
2. Fewer than 60% of the properties within the proposed district are
owner-occupied. The calculation is based on the proposed district, not
an individual block face, and it is the property not the number of
households at a property.
3. There is nothing to prevent you from having different hourly and
time-restricted regulations in your district.

Please read section 102-301 which thoroughly discusses the process of
establishing the district.

Let me know when or if I can be of assistance.

Good luck and thanks,

Steven D. Bergin
Department of Public Works
Parking Division

Residentail Restricted Parking District

OHHIC Historical Documentation of the Site of Richmond’s Proposed Amphitheater

Remember the 60 page report? Well now Charles Pool has expanded it to 106 pages. We can only hope intellectual honesty and historic fact will matter as the City decides on Venture Richmond’s plan. It is also important to again recognize that there is a compromise plan that Venture Richmond has so far ignored that would avoid cutting into the historic canal.

OHHIC Historical Documentation of the Site of Venture Richmond’s Proposed Amphitheater (final) January 2014

Because of its national importance, the James River and Kanawha Canal should not be altered, cut, lowered or filled for trivial reasons, such as for improving sight lines or making it easier to cut the grass. It is vital that George Washington’s 18th century canal be afforded the respect that it deserves so that this rare historic resource one day can be a restored “blueway,” a treasure for future generations of citizens of the Commonwealth.

Tredegar Holds Seance This Halloween

From the American Civil War Center website:

Spirit rapping, ghostly instruments, and other attempts at communion with the dead were once common occurrences in American parlors.

People from every social strata attended séances where mediums purported to be in contact with departed spirits. During the Civil War thousands desperate to contact fallen loved ones enlisted the aid of a medium. What would they have experienced at one of these sittings?

Find out at Historic Tredegar when we present a historically accurate séance inspired by the Spiritualist movement.

Join us October 28th – November 1st for this mysterious evening’s entertainment. Our story centers on Mr. and Mrs. Nelson as they seek to communicate to their son who lost his life during the Civil War.

Admission
$5

Click here to open the website and purchase online.

Idlewood Roundabout Project Receives Funding From VCU

This ordinance was passed by City Council last night:

Ord. No. 2013-209 (Patron: Mayor Jones) – To authorize the Chief Administrative Officer to accept $250,000 from Virginia Commonwealth University and to appropriate the increase to the Fiscal Year 2013-2014 Capital Budget by increasing estimated revenues and the amount appropriated to the Department of Public Works’ Traffic Calming/Idlewood Roundabout project in the Transportation category by $250,000 for the construction of a roundabout at the intersection of Idlewood Avenue, Grayland Avenue and an off ramp from the Downtown Expressway.

More on this here and here.

Phil Updates Bike Questions

With the help of Bunny Hop bicycle shop’s new location, Oregon Hill is becoming more well known as a bike neighborhood.

In a recent “Why Richmond, Why?!?” Richmond.com column, Phil Riggan supplied the goods on “dead bikes” and more.

Some informative excerpts:

I bike often and consider myself a cyclist, so I feel qualified to say that the cycling community is it’s own harshest critic. Many of the questions I get about cycling issues and traffic violations come from cyclists. Usually, the conversations will lead to a need to have drivers and pedestrians improve their knowledge of the rules of road for bikes. Questions like “can bikes ride on sidewalks (yes),” “can bikes ride against traffic in roadway lanes and on one-way streets (no),” “can bikes ride through stop signs and red lights (no),” and more. Check VDOT for more biking tips and regulations.

It seems like a majority of the complaints about bike violations centers around the Virginia Commonwealth University campus, a place flooded with students who — surprise! — bike, walk, run and even skateboard all over the place.

As for traffic violations, RPD shared figures on citations were issued to cyclists:
In 2012: 47 citations issued to cyclists. Of those 21 were for code section 46.2-1015, which is not having lights and/or reflectors on the bike.
In 2013: As of this past Friday, 83 citations issued to cyclists. Of those, 20 of them were for code section 46.2-1015, which is not having lights and/or reflectors, and 21 were for code section 46.2-833, which is for a Signal Light Violation.
That is a big jump in violations and I hope this is satisfactory for anyone who doubts that cyclists are held responsible for their behavior on the roads. I’d like to think that there has been a correlating increase in the number of cyclists in accounting for the rise in citations, but no way to know for certain as we currently don’t have a bike census.
One more thing for you James River Park System trail riders (and anyone else who uses the trails): The system to utilize the flexible brown trail emergency locator markers (pictured at left) are not yet operational. You may have noticed the markers, they have ID marks for locations that 911 operators could use to dispatch responders for injured users.
“Regarding the trail marker signs, they are not yet fully operational. We are currently working with the James River Park System, the Richmond Fire Department and the Richmond Ambulance Authority to make sure everything is all set up and working properly,” according to Dionne Waugh of the Richmond Police Department.